View on GitHub

memo

Tightness

Tightness

Definiton 1

$\Pi$ is said to be relatively compact if

\[\forall \{P_{n}\}_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \subseteq \Pi, \ \exists \{P_{i_{n}}\}_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \subseteq \{P_{n}\}_{n}, \ \exists P \ \text{ s.t. } P_{i_{n}} \overset{w}{\rightarrow} P .\]

$\Pi$ is said to be tight if

\[\forall \epsilon > 0, \ \exists K \subseteq S \ \text{ s.t. } K \text{ is compact and } P(K) \ge 1 - \epsilon \ (\forall P \in \Pi) .\]

Definition 2

\(\{X^{a}\}_{a \in \Lambda}\) is said to be relatively compact if \(\{P(X^{a})^{-1}\}\) is relatively compact.

\(\{X^{a}\}_{a \in \Lambda}\) is said to be tight if \(\{P(X^{a})^{-1}\}\) is tight.

Theorem 3 Prohorov Theorem

Then the following statements are equivalent;

(1) $\Pi$ is tight

(2) $\Pi$ is realatively compact.

proof

$\Box$

Definiton 4

\[\begin{eqnarray} m^{T}(\omega, \delta) & := & \max_{\abs{s - t} \le \delta, 0 \le s, t \le T} \abs{ \omega(s) - \omega(t) } \nonumber \end{eqnarray}\]

is caleld the modulus of continuity on $[0, T]$.

Proposition 5

proof

$\Box$

Reference